Assessing VCs-Not Their Money
This article was originally published in Start Up
As the survey underlying the lead story in this issue (6/04) of Start-Up makes abundantly clear, entrepreneurs want--and should get--a lot more from a VC than its ability to write checks. Here's a checklist on how to assess VCs.
You may also be interested in...
What makes a health care VC stand out in the minds of entrepreneurs? According to a first-of-its-kind survey by Windhover, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Wilson Sonsini, and Applied Information Networks, the answer is value-added services. Entrepreneurs prize VCs who assist them, pre-financing, with constructive feedback and sharing of due diligence results. VCs do pretty well here. But they do less well on the more important post-financing criteria: helping their portfolio companies secure additional financing and recruit customers, partners, and employees.
Is there an explanation for the recent spate of biotech Phase II and Phase III clinical trial failures? It's almost impossible to give general reasons for specific clinical failures. Several hypotheses, borrowed from the tenets of behavioral finance, however, may help explain some recent, unanticipated later-stage setbacks. They may also support other studies that suggest that small biotech companies fail more often in clinical development than their larger biotech and pharma brethren.
Venture-backed biotech companies are increasingly seeking to commercialize drugs that qualify for orphan drug protection from the FDA; is this business model a good idea?