Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Spin-Out Step-Ups Reflect Bulk, Not Risk

This article was originally published in Start Up

Executive Summary

An analysis of a group of Big Pharma and big biotech spin-outs, which tend to raise more private money than their build-from-scratch bretheren, shows that while these firms are certainly heftier--and often considered better equiped to succeed in the public markets--their pre-money step-ups are in the end, nothing special.

Spin-outs tend to raise more money privately than their build-from-scratch brethren, and in Europe are seen as one of the few sustainable biotechnology business models. (See "Are Spin-Outs Really a Better Bet?" START-UP, October 2004 (Also see "Are Spin-Outs Really a Better Bet?" - Scrip, 1 Oct, 2004.).) But an analysis of our group of Big Pharma or big biotech spin-outs that have hit the public markets since 2002 suggests that while these firms are certainly heftier—and often considered better equipped to succeed in the public markets—their pre-money step-ups are in the end, nothing special. (See Exhibit 1.)

Which isn't surprising: intrinsic to the concept of a spin-out from a larger firm is less risk for VC investors; consequently those firms that took a punt on most companies here saw average pre-money step-ups at best. But even spin-outs have bad days at the office: Barrier Therapeutics Inc. 's market value was halved in late June when the firm's Phase III study of the an oral version of the anti-fungal itraconazole (Hyphanox) failed to meet its primary endpoint in vaginal candidiasis.

Missing from this graph is the main success story of the group, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. While not technically a spin-out (nor, incidentally, is Arpida Ltd. ), Actelion's Roche pedigree helped it zoom to a step-up of nearly 17 on its 2000 IPO; since then the firm's market value has nearly tripled. (See "Actelion: A Model for European Biotech," In Vivo Europe Rx, September 2003 (Also see "Actelion: A Model for European Biotech" - In Vivo, 1 Sep, 2003.).)

ZymoGenetics Inc. , which floated back in 2002 after being spun out of Novo Nordisk AS , is perhaps the only pure-play biotech in the group; its latest-stage project at IPO was in Phase II. [See Deal][See Deal] Basilea Pharmaceutica AG and Arpida each have past ties to Roche; [See Deal] Tercica Inc. and Barrier were spun out of Genentech Inc. and Johnson & Johnson respectively, and each went public in 2004. [See Deal][See Deal] Each of these four companies had Phase III assets at floatation. The most recent addition to the group, the Franco-Scottish ProStrakan Group PLC , already markets its own products and listed on the LSE in June after a protracted battle over valuation. [See Deal] One of its constituent companies, the Paris-based ProSkelia SAS , spun out of Aventis (now Sanofi-Aventis ) in 2002. [See Deal]

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC091130

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel