Starting Big
This article was originally published in Start Up
Executive Summary
Increasing fund size, a depressed but competitive public stock market, and rule-bound money managers unable to even consider investing in small firms are compelling private investors to seek new, deliberately big models for start-up firms. Some VCs are making long-term bets on star-powered teams of people trying to integrate brand-new technologies. If fully-formed start-ups can dramatically improve the drug discovery process, and retain the value they build, they stand to enjoy huge step-ups in valuation when they eventually do go public. Investors seeking faster-than-average returns think they can quickly build integrated-technology companies by buying the basic underpinnings at discount-for instance, by acquiring experienced research groups from major drugmakers anxious to cut costs-then quickly taking the start-ups public. In-licensing may also offer a faster route to ROI. Investors are updating the old model, applying stacks of cash to help certain start-ups acquire operating infrastructure, and reach for big opportunities. Backers expect that big-name founders will be able to net products that elude less experienced people.
You may also be interested in...
Infinity/Purdue: The Challenge of Reprising Roche/Genentech
Infinity's "Big Brother" deal with the privately held affiliates Purdue and Mundipharma comes closest of any recent deal to replicating the structure of the Genentech/Roche relationship -- swapping the majority of a biotech's pipeline to a well-heeled partner in return for independence from the capital markets and enough commercial upside to deliver a long-term return for investors. But the idiosyncrasies of the Purdue/Mundipharma ownership and structure, and the recent stormy history that opened minds to the possibility of such a deal, show why further iterations of the model will remain a rarity.
Infinity/Purdue: The Challenge of Reprising Roche/Genentech
Infinity's "Big Brother" deal with the privately held affiliates Purdue and Mundipharma comes closest of any recent deal to replicating the structure of the Genentech/Roche relationship -- swapping the majority of a biotech's pipeline to a well-heeled partner in return for independence from the capital markets and enough commercial upside to deliver a long-term return for investors. But the idiosyncrasies of the Purdue/Mundipharma ownership and structure, and the recent stormy history that opened minds to the possibility of such a deal, show why further iterations of the model will remain a rarity.
Amgen Moves Beyond Proteins
Amgen's revenue stream depends largely on just two molecules. It has spent loads of money on the search for replacements, but as yet has relatively little to show for it--at least, little that's been visible to those outside the company. To enlarge its opportunity set, Amgen is moving beyond its macromolecule-only heritage. A fresh cadre of executives, many from Merck, aim to add small-molecule capabilities and leverage corporate understanding of proteins and pathway biology. Amgen is also tapping into a host of other organizations whose technologies, targets, assays and very ways of thinking promise to make the firm more competitive than it could be on its own. While some investors think Amgen is making all the right moves, others are still concerned about the company's ability to bring enough new drugs to market, fast enough, to fill in behind its blockbuster proteins.