Bad Haircuts: 2005's Biotech IPOs--Getting Out at Any Price?
This article was originally published in Start Up
Executive Summary
The haircuts suffered by 2005's biotech IPOs are further proof that while the appetite for biotech offerings exists, public investors are demanding a better likelihood of post-market upside.
You may also be interested in...
Equity Agreement With LLC Gives MediciNova Potential To Move Two Lead Programs Into Phase III
A $20 million common stock purchase agreement with Aspire Capital provides MediciNova some breathing room as it attempts to negotiate partnerships around a pair of mid-stage small-molecule candidates.
Biotech Backers Are Learning to Live with Exit-by-Earn-out
Despite a few bright spots, the fundraising environment remains difficult for many venture investors. Biotechs that went public during the 2005-2007 window have largely underperformed, despite hitting the stock exchanges with what plenty of CEOs and VCs felt were artificially low prices negotiated by an oligarchy of biotech IPO buyers. Moreover, pharmaceutical companies have been buying fewer, not more, biotechs - even as more companies are seemingly created with acquisition, not IPO, in mind. Meanwhile, the M&A deals that do occur are increasingly risk-sharing affairs that resemble alliances, replete with earn-out payments triggered by development, regulatory, or commercial milestones. In short: good venture exits have been extremely hard to come by. And data from Elsevier's Strategic Transactions analyzed by START-UP suggest that although these risk-sharing deal structures may be a by-product of a miserable economy, they are likely to stick around regardless of any economic turnaround.
Biotech Backers Are Learning to Live with Exit-by-Earn-out
Despite a few bright spots, the fundraising environment remains difficult for many venture investors. Biotechs that went public during the 2005-2007 window have largely underperformed, despite hitting the stock exchanges with what plenty of CEOs and VCs felt were artificially low prices negotiated by an oligarchy of biotech IPO buyers. Moreover, pharmaceutical companies have been buying fewer, not more, biotechs - even as more companies are seemingly created with acquisition, not IPO, in mind. Meanwhile, the M&A deals that do occur are increasingly risk-sharing affairs that resemble alliances, replete with earn-out payments triggered by development, regulatory, or commercial milestones. In short: good venture exits have been extremely hard to come by. And data from Elsevier's Strategic Transactions analyzed by START-UP suggest that although these risk-sharing deal structures may be a by-product of a miserable economy, they are likely to stick around regardless of any economic turnaround.