Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Seoul Court Overturns Health Ministry's 14-Percent Price Cut On Novartis' Glivec

This article was originally published in PharmAsia News

Executive Summary

SEOUL - Seoul's Administrative Court ruled in favor of Novartis and suspended the Korean health ministry's plan to cut the price of the Swiss-based company's leukemia drug Glivec (imatinib) by 14 percent beginning Sept. 15

You may also be interested in...



Seoul Court Maintains Stance Not To Raise Novartis' Glivec Price; Health Ministry May Appeal To Higher Court

SEOUL - In what appears to be a victory - at least for now - for multinational pharma companies in their fight against mounting calls for price cuts, a Seoul Administrative Court maintained its earlier stance and ruled that a court-ordered price cut for Novartis' Glivec (imatinib) goes against "fairness" and the purpose of the EU free trade agreement

Seoul Court Maintains Stance Not To Raise Novartis' Glivec Price; Health Ministry May Appeal To Higher Court

SEOUL - In what appears to be a victory - at least for now - for multinational pharma companies in their fight against mounting calls for price cuts, a Seoul Administrative Court maintained its earlier stance and ruled that a court-ordered price cut for Novartis' Glivec (imatinib) goes against "fairness" and the purpose of the EU free trade agreement

Seoul Court Maintains Stance Not To Raise Novartis' Glivec Price; Health Ministry May Appeal To Higher Court

A mandated price cut for imatinib goes against "fairness" and the purpose of the EU free trade agreement, the court said.

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC072758

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel