Supreme Court Outcome Unlikely To Dent IPR Popularity
The impact of an expected Supreme Court ruling to the US Patent & Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board and its inter partes review process – proceedings intended to be faster and more affordable alternatives to challenging patents, versus pursuing litigation through the US court system – may not be as significant as the biopharmaceutical industry has been fretting over. The court heard oral arguments in the case, known as Cuozzo Speed v. Michelle Lee, on April 25. A decision is expected by the end of June.
You may also be interested in...
With new funding in hand, Moderna and its infectious disease venture Valera are going full-speed ahead with a Zika vaccine, taking an mRNA approach, which they said could be a more rapid strategy to try to stop the disease.
Allergan CEO Brent Saunders vows not to engage in price gouging and says his firm will limit cost increases to single-digit percentages, occurring only once per year. But it's unclear whether Saunders will stand as a lone wolf in the industry or if others will make similar pledges.
Hillary Clinton's plan to rein in high prices of older medicines, which includes creating a federal panel that has authority to impose fines, may grab headlines, but some analysts think it's unlikely to get very far in a divided Washington.