Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Pasteur Institute loses patent case against Abbott

This article was originally published in Scrip

Executive Summary

French media have carried an AFP report that the Pasteur Institutehas been unsuccessful in a legal challenge over three of its patents that it said Abbott had infringed. It was claiming more than €7.6 million fromAbbott, but now will have to pay €150,000 to cover the company's court costs. The French institute and the US National Institutes of Health had a cross-linked intellectual property agreement relating to HIV1 testing, allowing each to license out aspects of the other's work. A Paris court has found that the Pasteur Institute's patents were covered by its licensing agreement with the NIH and that Abbott's sublicence to use them was valid. None of the parties has yet made an official statement on the ruling.

You may also be interested in...



Cervarix link to UK girl's death "unlikely"

Local health authorities in Coventry, UK, say it is most unlikely that vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix (human papillomavirus vaccine) was the cause of the death of a 14-year-old schoolgirl on September 28th.

Generic Topamax launched in European markets

Patents on Janssen-Cilag's (Johnson & Johnson) anti-epileptic Topamax/Epitomax (topiramate) expired in many European countries on September 25th, and generics companies are launching their own versions quickly.

NICE confirms limits on Alimta for lung cancer

Lilly's Alimta (pemetrexed) has been recommended as a first-line treatment for some patients in England and Wales with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in binding guidance for the national health service.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC031490

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel