SCOTUS: Antitrust applies in pay-for-delay, but gotta prove it
This article was originally published in Scrip
Executive Summary
With the US Supreme Court declaring in a 5-3 decision on 17 June that so-called pay-for-delay deals between big pharmas and generic drug makers are not immune from antitrust attacks, yet the agreements also are not "presumptively unlawful," both sides on the dispute – the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the biopharmaceutical industry – claimed victory, although acknowledging it's complicated.
You may also be interested in...
Moderna's Valera Takes mRNA Approach To Combat Zika
With new funding in hand, Moderna and its infectious disease venture Valera are going full-speed ahead with a Zika vaccine, taking an mRNA approach, which they said could be a more rapid strategy to try to stop the disease.
Allergan's Price Reform Pledge: Will Others Follow?
Allergan CEO Brent Saunders vows not to engage in price gouging and says his firm will limit cost increases to single-digit percentages, occurring only once per year. But it's unclear whether Saunders will stand as a lone wolf in the industry or if others will make similar pledges.
Clinton's Drug Price Plan: Threat Or Flash In The Political Pan?
Hillary Clinton's plan to rein in high prices of older medicines, which includes creating a federal panel that has authority to impose fines, may grab headlines, but some analysts think it's unlikely to get very far in a divided Washington.