ANALYSIS: Measuring R&D success and myth
This article was originally published in Scrip
Who has been the best Big Pharma research and development (R&D) chief in the pharmaceutical industry recently? Those interested in the industry likely have found themselves asking this question. Often, it is argued that it is difficult to make an apples-to-apples judgment due to long development timelines, or different market climates.
You may also be interested in...
The fundamental problem with the pharmaceutical industry’s old business model could be astonishingly similar to the elusive challenge to balance healthcare quality and costs. Different times call for people to be working toward different goals. Biopharma and the healthcare system are working to the wrong goal.
Two businessmen talked intently sitting at a small white table dwarfed by an enormous video screen probably about 15 feet high and 20 feet wide. Covered in a cold bluish-red electronic glow, their meeting appeared as if it were occurring in New York City's Times Square, at night.
China - specifically its healthcare industry and market - is too often seen through the eyes of the Western companies as a manifest destiny, a promised land for new growth. This view is heavily unidirectional in that this enormous economically growing country is an open frontier upon which they will capitalize by bringing their advanced products.