Problems with risk-sharing study must not deter future collaborations
This article was originally published in Scrip
“A costly failure” and “a fiasco” are just two of the epithets that have been used to describe the UK’s first-ever risk-sharing scheme to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of two multiple sclerosis therapies, β-interferon and glatiramer acetate. Or as one commentator put it: “This may well be the most expensive publicly-funded ongoing health-related study in the UK, and probably anywhere, ever.”
You may also be interested in...
Drug failures in Phase III and value-based pricing were two forces affecting Horizon and Vertex, respectively, last week. Biogen and Teva have shown that value, at least, is a force to be argued with.
The health care industry has come a long way in the past 35 years, although in some areas very little has changed. Recently retired In Vivo editor Peter Charlish has seen most of the major developments, and in his final feature, he looks back at some of the big stories in a reporting career that began in the early 1980s.
Less invasive transcatheter techniques will increasingly displace older, riskier open-heart procedures in the treatment of heart valve disease, according to a new Meddevicetracker report. By 2021, transcatheter systems will account for 76% of the global market for heart valve disease treatment products, with the US retaining its current dominant position in this sector.