Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

NICE rejection of Erbitux in head and neck cancer is final

This article was originally published in Scrip

Using Merck Serono's (Merck KGaA) Erbitux (cetuximab), in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, to treat patients in England and Wales with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck would not be a cost-effective use of UK national health service resources, an assessment agency has found.

The National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which evaluates health technologies for the NHS, has published binding guidance that reiterates the conclusions of an earlier draft (scripnews.com, April 28th, 2009).

The institute published guidance last year, all but ruling out cetuximab in a similar indication, locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. It said cetuximab could be used in a subset of patients with Karnofsky performance status scores of 90% or more and for whom all forms of platinum-based chemotherapy were considered inappropriate, but there are few – if any – patients who meet these criteria.

Cetuximab was also rejected in colorectal cancer indications.

In metastatic head and neck cancer, the NICE appraisal committee estimated that the cost of an additional quality-adjusted life year resulting from treatment with cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone would be £121,367, and predicted an overall gain in survival of just over two months.

"This would mean the NHS making significant funds available for a very expensive treatment which may or may not benefit individual patients. Those funds would not then be available for treating other conditions with greater and more certain benefits for other patients," NICE said.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC002875

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel