Scrip is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Proposed Sunscreen Monograph Hikes Costs, Increases Prices – CHPA, PCPC

Executive Summary

Changes in tentative final OTC sunscreen monograph would increase testing costs than FDA estimates and leave consumers with fewer, more expensive products to choose from, say CHPA and PCPC. Firms estimate testing costs will increase roughly 25% to 30% based on proposed changes in protocols.

You may also be interested in...

Innovating Outside OTC Monograph Lines: Trending Acne Patches, Hand And Foot Antiperspirants

Industry and the FDA agree that the OTC drug monograph system is direly in need of reform, but innovating with noncompliant dosage forms and indications, without approved new drug applications, is a risk companies need to weigh seriously, says Arnall Golden Gregory partner Alan Minsk. The FDA offers perspective on its OTC monographs for acne and antiperspirant products.

FDA Sunscreen MUsT’s ‘Real World’ Applicability Under Debate, Which Could Hold Up Testing

Spaulding Clinical, which the FDA contracted for its sunscreen maximal usage trial published in May, is in discussions with a handful of sunscreen industry players about doing more MUsTs to fulfill data needs identified by the agency. Meanwhile, leading trade groups are interested in talking to the FDA about developing sunscreen study protocols that more accurately reflect real-world consumer usage.

FDA’s Sunscreen Regulatory Approach Misaligned With Its Public Health Messaging, Trade Groups Say

The Personal Care Products Council and Consumer Healthcare Products Association say FDA’s tentative final sunscreen monograph and related communications have given rise to confusion that could lead to reduced sunscreen use and negative public health consequences. The groups go one further: FDA should reissue a tentative final monograph proposing that the 12 chemical UV filters currently in question are GRASE.

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: Click here for more information on the Ask the Analyst service.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts