Glutamine Claim Class Action Against GNC Gets Wide Berth For Relevant Studies
This article is powered by The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
An Illinois federal judge denies GNC motion to dismiss based partly on argument that studies of products with different formulations or delivery formats than the challenged Pro Performance supplements are inappropriate as evidence for the complaint alleging consumer fraud.
You may also be interested in...
Another Court Ruling Rejects RCT Standard For Supplement Claims
Two years after Bayer prevailed against FTC's demand for RCTs to substantiate claims for its Phillips Colon Health probiotic, a judge dismisses a class action complaint targeting the product, saying the plaintiffs did not support their argument and their expert expected supplements to be evaluated as drugs.
Poor Fit For FitTea Evidence, No Free Pass For Testimonials – NAD
NAD advises Fit Products to modify FitTea claims because its formulation is not the same as studies submitted and reminds the firm that testimonials must not contain false claims about products.
Jurors' Answers In FTC's Prevagen Complaint Might Burst A Memory Bubble For Health Claims
“No” answers in New York federal court on whether all but two of Prevagen claims were “materially misleading” could put a fork in the road of a long dispute between FTC and supplement product manufacturers and marketers.