GMO Bills Differ On Labeling, But Agree On Pre-empting State Laws
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
H.R. 1599 would create a structure for codifying GMOs in foods and supplements and make labeling voluntary, but opponents say it keeps consumers in the dark while pre-empting state laws. S. 809 and H.R. 1699, meanwhile, would require labeling for genetically engineered products.
You may also be interested in...
In an interview with “The Rose Sheet,” Natural Products Association Executive Director and CEO Dan Fabricant discussed the trade group’s priorities in developing cosmetics legislation while acknowledging that advocates may face an uphill battle in the current Congress.
The supplement industry’s new ally in the Senate, Martin Heinrich, encourages industry to increase self-regulation of energy drinks to avoid opening DSHEA to amendments. He also says national GMO labeling legislation could spare industry from a patchwork of state laws.
Thync Global’s Zing Energy neurostimulation patch and Tesla Nootropics’ Nubrain Brainstorm caffeine-free water are promoted as alternatives to caffeine and energy drinks. They join a market dominated by big brands but with competition growing from products that boost energy without caffeine and sugar.