AMA opposes BTC class
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
The American Medical Association reaffirms its stance against a formal behind-the-counter drug class under consideration by FDA (see story, p. 5). A resolution introduced by AMA's Michigan delegation cites BTC prescribing as potentially "out of the realm of a pharmacist's training," which "might affect patient safety and quality of care." The AMA House of Delegates, which held its annual meeting June 15, did not pass the resolution because the association in 1984 adopted a policy opposing "a third transitional class of drugs." AMA questions FDA's authority to create a third drug class (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 19, 2007, p. 4)...
You may also be interested in...
BTC Proponents Cite Pharmacists’ Role; Opponents Question Need
There is one thing agreed on by opponents and proponents of assigning drugs to behind-the-counter status, including representatives from the pharmaceutical industry, drug retailers, the pharmacy and medical professions, researchers and consumer advocates: FDA will need a long time to reach a decision on the issue, they say
Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April
Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.
Health And Wellness Weekly Trademarks Review: 16 April
Trademarks are registered and published for opposition with the US Patent and Trademark Office and are published weekly in the agency's Official Gazette.