Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Merck Moves Forward With Odanacatib Filing; FDA Accepts MK-3475 Filing

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

At a May 6 investor day, Merck’s R&D head Roger Perlmutter revealed the safety issues that have been delaying the company’s late-stage osteoporosis drug and tried to renew confidence in the treatment.

You may also be interested in...



Merck Bets Big On Oncology In New R&D Strategy

The big pharma will establish a new oncology unit focused on bringing its anti-PD-1 immunotherapy MK-3475 to market as part of a massive R&D overhaul aimed at lowering costs while driving innovation. Merck isn’t one of the industry’s leading oncology players and may not have as much R&D expertise in the area as rivals, but it might not ultimately matter – as long as MK-3475 gets to market.

Regenerating Interest In Novel Drugs For Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

New bone-targeted agents for osteoporosis must clear significant obstacles to succeed in a highly generic market, but safety concerns with established agents like bisphosphonates and calcitonin offer a foothold. Phase III anabolic candidates from Amgen and Radius Health aim to build new bone, the holy grail of osteoporosis treatment, but R&D in new anti-resorptive mechanisms to halt bone breakdown also continues.

With Odanacatib Filing Pushed Back, Merck Reports Flat Top-Line Growth In 2012

Merck’s delay of filing an NDA for its osteoporosis drug odanacatib surprised analysts, but Merck remained mum on its reasoning in a year-end earnings call on Feb. 1.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS077289

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel